4

Writing What You Don’t Know

Posted by Rachel on October 5, 2015 in current event, musings, writing |

Lately there’s been a lot of chatter about what people can/should write…or not. I’ve expressed my feelings before about writing what you love, and loving what you write so this subject seemed like something I should blog about.

TL;DR: My opinion is pretty simple: write what you want to write. Put in the time, effort, and hard work it takes to make “what you don’t know” as real and authentic as possible.

The old phrase says, “write what you know” and I think that is something all writers embrace. We write characters with similarities to ourselves or people we know. We write about places we’ve been or that have bits and pieces of those places thrown in. We also write about experiences, dreams, or struggles we’ve endured. That’s all very true, but we also write about characters and places and experiences that we never could possibly know–like worlds with magic, or building a colony on mars, or a high school under attack by zombies. So when people claim they (or others) can’t or shouldn’t write what they don’t know, I call shenanigans.

Speaking from personal experience as an alternate history writer, I have to imagine history taking a completely different turn than it did and what that might look like. No one ever lived it, but my job as a writer is to (hopefully) make you believe it could have happened. This takes a LOT of research and sometimes people disagree with my assessment. Sometimes they disagree with things from my own experiences I wove in. Frankly, whether it’s a new city, zombies or a change of history, we have the tough job of making those things real–making them believable. This requires research. Sometimes a heaping ton of research. So much research you want to give up on the idea all together. But when it’s a story we know we must tell, we push forward and do what’s necessary to give it a voice.

Okay, so with that said, what about writing about demographics that you don’t fit into? Other religions, other genders, other sexualities, other races, other mental or physical health than your own? I say, go for it. Be prepared to work hard at this story, though. Maybe harder than you’ve ever worked before.

Important// Your desire to write something outside your experience shouldn’t be about riding a trend. These experiences belong to real people. Real people are not trends. Zombies are a trend, mental health is not. If you want to write about X because you think it will get you published, then you’re writing it for the wrong reasons. If you want to write about X because that character or story is something you feel you must tell, then take the chance. //Important

You might be thinking, “Won’t I be stepping on the toes of people who lived those experiences?” If done to the best of your ability, I don’t believe so. Ultimately, though, people writing about their own experiences and own communities will naturally be more authentic. And they should be. They should stand as something to emulate, not copy. You should work to lift up their voice first and foremost, but this shouldn’t stop you from writing either. It is your duty as the writer to put in the time to ensure these characters, places, or experiences are true to life. Yes, you can certainly still “write what you know”. I believe that is true of any story and you’ll intentionally or unintentionally bring in bits of your life or personality to the book, but there are plenty of things you will not know. There will be plenty of things you never even thought about that play into the lives of other people.

Part of researching what you don’t know should involve asking the people who do. This can absolutely seem terrifying and daunting, because what if you offend them? And you might. But you’ll be glad you got their opinion because it will provide invaluable insight. After all, you won’t find everything you need on the internet or in books. Another important tactic to writing what you don’t know is to read novels about the people you’re writing. Even better if you read the books by AND about the people you’re writing. Learn as much as you can.

Important // Even when you talk to people who have lived the experience you’re writing about, please remember they are just one story and don’t represent the whole of that demographic. There is no single story for Black people, for LGBT people, or any one else. There is no “normal”. Everyone’s story is unique. If you ask for like-minded betas to read, remember it’s true there as well. But also listen. Truly listen to the thoughts and opinions of these people and do your best to honor their experiences. If that means total rewrites, so be it. You’ll be glad you did. //Important

It’s not about being brave, it’s about doing your job and not half-assing it.

So let’s be real, even once your story is out in the world, some people will hate it. People will also love it. Even if it’s an experience you personally lived, people will 100% find something wrong with it — something stereotypical and unbelievable about it. It’s not going to be perfect in everyone’s eyes no matter what you’re writing about. At the end of the day, though, you should be proud of the work you put in and the way you wrote your story, whether it was something you knew or something new.

4 Comments

  • […] Deciding what to write about can be the hardest part of writing. Do you stay in your wheelhouse, or venture abroad? Rachel Horwitz discusses how to respectfully write what you don’t know. […]

  • Elle says:

    It’s about more than hard work, though. When someone gets a place in the setting wrong, or uses parsecs for a measure of time, it doesn’t perpetuate a harmful stereotype that furthers the oppression of a people. It’s not disrespectful to their heritage or making something light of their sacred space. The parsecs aren’t treated unfairly or edged out of being included with the other measurements. They aren’t seeing misrepresentations of themselves, they aren’t wondering why someone put this about them into the world. Representation and inclusion isn’t a job, it’s a right.

    Hard work doesn’t makeup for the erasure that takes place in the industry, both on the page and behind the scenes. The stepping on toes happens, whether people want to believe it does or not, though it’s more like being pushed aside completely than mildly inconvenienced. It’s disheartening when people don’t take that into consideration, or think it can be overcome by essentially doing more of the stepping.

    With publishing operating the way it does, I always want to know why someone wants to write this particular story knowing what it means and could lead to. Why work hard to contribute to the issue in any way, shape, or form? Because more of the same thing doesn’t help anyone, it just keeps things going. It maintains the status quo. When it comes to representation, hard work is not enough. Authenticity is only part of the equation.

    • Rachel says:

      I definitely agree with you, Elle. Although, I think you misunderstood my point about “doing your job”. I meant as a writer we are tasked with creating realistic worlds and in those worlds authenticity is extremely important – that’s what I was trying to get at in my post. People do a lot of extra work when it comes to fantasy elements to their stories to make them authentic and realistic, but that’s not always the case where real people are being represented. I want writers to create real people, not cardboard stereotypes.

      • Elle says:

        Creating “real people” isn’t enough, I don’t think. What I mean is representation is at a point where it’s about more than research to get the characters right. These are people. These are their lives, these are the difficulties they have to deal with thanks to misrepresentation in the media among other things. This is someone once again seeing how someone looking in views it all, not from someone in it. It’s not something that can be overcome with research.

        It’s also about more than someone having something negative to say about a book. That’s entirely subjective, and representation–at it’s core–is not an issue of subjectivity. You can not like a book because you don’t like the genre, or the POV (1st, 3rd, etc) or you don’t like certain elements, but having a problem with a book because it hurts you is completely different. And for people to lump it together with all of that other stuff essentially invalidates that pain. It’s like being called a slur and being told “well, people call folks out of their name, it’s gonna happen.” Someone calling me stupid or dummy or even b*tch is NOT the same as being called the n-word. That does something completely different and hurts on a whole other level. That can’t be ignored.

        And again, with publishing being happy to have diversity, as long as it doesn’t involve diverse people, there’s the problem in just adding to that. Some people see it as censorship. Not one is telling folks to stop writing completely. Just asking for a chance to be seen as themselves instead of someone else stepping forward and saying “This is how they are. I worked real hard to make sure it’s them.”

        Just my take.

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2010-2026 You Are What You Write All rights reserved.
This site is using the Desk Mess Mirrored theme, v2.5, from BuyNowShop.com.